Napkin math

What one unreliable conference room costs

I gave four AIs the same conservative profile of one meeting room and asked what that room wastes in a year. Every answer came back five figures. The assumptions, the results, and the prompt are all below so you can run your own numbers.

The test

Same inputs, four AIs

The profile I gave each one. Nothing exotic, and deliberately on the low side:

People in a typical meeting6
Loaded hourly cost per person$75
Minutes lost getting each meeting started5
Meetings per week in the room12
Meetings rescheduled because of tech, per month2
Customer-facing meetings per month8
Rough value of a deal at the table$50,000

What each AI said one room costs per year:

Claude$19,500
ChatGPT$25,260
Gemini$38,150
Grok$42,150

The spread is the honest part. Each AI made its own assumptions about failure rates and how much a bad meeting matters, so the exact number moved around. None of them treated it as a small problem.

Check it yourself

The math you can do on a whiteboard

You don't need an AI for the biggest piece. Multiply the people in the room by their loaded hourly cost, the minutes lost getting started, and the meetings per week:

6 people × $75/hr × 5 min × 12 meetings/week ≈ $450 a week

Over 50 working weeks that's about $22,500 a year in slow starts alone. More than the most conservative AI answer, and it counts nothing for rescheduled meetings, decisions that sat waiting, or a glitch during a customer pitch.

These are estimates built from assumptions, not measurements. Think of the result as capacity at risk rather than cash out the door, and change any input that doesn't match your rooms.

Run your own numbers

The prompt

Paste this into whichever AI you use. It shows your numbers back to you in a table first, so you can correct them in one reply or just say "run it."

I want to understand what unreliable meeting-room technology actually costs my
company per year.

Start by showing my numbers below in a single table so I can correct any of
them in one reply. If I say "run it," use them as-is. Then do the full
calculation in one pass.

My starting numbers (rough):
- People in a typical meeting: 6
- Average loaded hourly cost per person: $75
- Minutes lost getting a typical meeting started (connections, audio, screen): 5
- Meetings per week in our main room: 12
- Meetings per month abandoned or rescheduled because of tech: 2
- Customer- or prospect-facing meetings per month: 8
- Rough value of a deal or relationship at the table: $50,000

Calculate, showing your work:
1. Annual cost of the routine slow starts.
2. Annual cost of reschedules, including the coordination time to re-book.
3. Expected annual deal value put at risk by visible tech failures in front of
   customers. Use a small, defensible failure rate and impact percentage, and
   state your assumptions.
4. Anything I'm not counting - for example, rooms people avoid because they
   don't trust them, or travel that video should have replaced.

Finish with a one-page summary table for a single room, then multiplied across
all rooms with the same setup. Keep every assumption conservative and visible -
I'd rather have a number I can defend than a big one.

After the summary, ask me one optional question: what was the last decision
that waited on a rescheduled meeting, and what did the wait cost? If I answer,
add it to the total - it's usually bigger than everything above. If I skip it,
that's fine.

The last question is optional on purpose. If you can name a decision that sat waiting on a rescheduled meeting, the total usually gets bigger.

Book an inspection

If one of your rooms came to mind, start there.

An independent inspection puts a diagnosis and a fix list in your hands before anyone sells you more hardware. Flat fee, no commissions.

I reply within one business day - async by design, no call centers. Prefer LinkedIn? Message me there.
Need your own team to carry this judgment across many rooms? Ask about private mentorship.